↓ Skip to main content

Identifying wrong assemblies in de novo short read primary sequence assembly contigs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biosciences, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 905)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Identifying wrong assemblies in de novo short read primary sequence assembly contigs
Published in
Journal of Biosciences, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12038-016-9630-0
Authors

Vandna Chawla, Rajnish Kumar, Ravi Shankar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Norway 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 33%
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Professor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 30%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,900,827
of 21,175,128 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biosciences
#18
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,681
of 280,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biosciences
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,175,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them