↓ Skip to main content

Identifying wrong assemblies in de novo short read primary sequence assembly contigs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biosciences, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 379)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Identifying wrong assemblies in de novo short read primary sequence assembly contigs
Published in
Journal of Biosciences, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12038-016-9630-0
Authors

Vandna Chawla, Rajnish Kumar, Ravi Shankar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 13%
Netherlands 1 13%
Unknown 6 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 50%
Student > Master 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 75%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2016.
All research outputs
#513,573
of 7,466,431 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biosciences
#7
of 379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,390
of 249,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biosciences
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,466,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 379 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.